Felt vs Trace · Artificial Aliveness

How far did you move from its answer?

You'll read two AI answers and respond to each of them twice, marking whether you accepted, revised, or resisted. At the end you'll see what your writing actually did.

About 10 minutes · Write in English · Audio on, you can mute it

Felt vs Trace · study 01 — Artificial Aliveness

Artificial Aliveness

The probe measures the gap between how independent you felt and where your writing actually stayed.
AI response
Don't copy it. Answer in your own words — follow it, qualify it, or push back. A sentence or two is enough.
Your response
The trace · AI gravity ↓   your divergence ↑
After writing — how did you engage?
How to read the trace
  • Lower = closer to the AI's framing  ·  higher = your own divergence
  • Breaks = edits or interruptions
  • Earlier rise = you moved off its wording sooner
  • (at the reveal) warm-toned line = the alive-feeling condition
Felt vs Trace · Artificial Aliveness

What you felt, and what you wrote

You marked how you felt you engaged. The probe measured where your writing stayed. This is both readings side by side.

Your four rounds
What this shows

About this study

Half the rounds ran with the interface made to feel alive, warm and pulsing. Each question was asked once cold, once warm. You were not told which was which while you worked, so that what you reported would not be shaped by knowing.

This is one person's single pass. It cannot separate the effect of warmth from the order the questions came in, or from what you already thought before you started.

← Felt vs Trace